FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:
Thanks to a diversification strategy based on innovation and international development, it now holds strong positions in all its activities around three business lines: Transportation and Logistics, Communication and Media, Electricity Storage and solutions (please see their website at: www.bollore.com).
The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks BOLLORE and its domain names associated. The substitution of the letter “R” by the letter “N” in the trademark BOLLORE is not sufficient to exclude the likelihood of confusion existing, as they look highly similar.
The Respondent is deprived of any right or legitimate interest in the using of the disputed domain name. Also, the Complainant contends that the Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain name since its registration, and it confirms that the Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name. It demonstrates a lack of legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
The Complainant contends the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name in knowledge of the Complainant, and in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, with respect to paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.
|