The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical to the trademark MELACYAN® (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy). The disputed domain name has been registered only one month after the filling of the corresponding trademark MELACYAN®.
The disputed domain name includes the distinctive trademark MELACYAN® in its entirety, without any modification.
Therefore, the use of the Complainant’s trademark in the disputed domain name gives rise to the inference that the Respondent ought to have registered the disputed domain name for its trademark value.
Moreover, the Respondent does not make any use of the disputed domain name. The website in relation with the disputed domain name points to a Registrar parked page displaying a general offer to sell the domain for $975. Thus, the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name only in order to sell it back for out-of-pockets costs, which evinces bad faith registration and use.
|