{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100352",
    "time_of_filling": "2011-12-09 11:19:06",
    "domain_names": [
        "ECCOSANDAL.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Tereza Bartošková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ECCO Sko A\/S"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Chas. Hude A\/S",
    "respondent": [
        "lin  yun xin"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nLanguage of the proceedings.\r\nThe Complainant respectfully request that the language of the proceedings be English. The domain name contains the English word SANDAL. The text on the website of the Respondent is in English. The goods sold on the website are referred to with English terms. The contact e-mail on the homepage is also in English. All these circumstances show that the Respondent is proficient in English, and therefore he\/she will not be disadvantaged if thelanguage of the proceedings would be English.\r\n\r\nLegal basis.\r\nThe disputed domain name contains Complainant's trademark ECCO in full. The addition of the generic term SANDAL does not preclude, but even enhance the risk of confusion \/ likelihood of association with the Complainant’s trademark and company name. Therefore, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark (Policy, Par. 4 (a)(1)).\r\n\r\nRespondent has no rights in the trademark ECCO and is not a reseller\/licensee of Complainant, use of the trademark ECCO by Respondent has never been authorized by Complainant. Accordingly, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name (policy, Par. 4 (a)(11)).\r\n\r\nThe fact that the Complainant’s trademark ECCO constitutes the dominant element of the disputed domain name, and that the Complainant’s logo is used by the Respondent without the rightful owner’s authorization constitute strong evidence of the fact that the Respondent is attempting to divert Internet users to his domain name by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademarks, company name and domain names. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Respondent is exploiting the goodwill attached to Complainant's trademarks for selling goods which are very likely counterfeit as well as goods bearing third parties’ trademarks. \r\n\r\nFor all these reasons, Complainant finds that the disputed domain name was registered and is used in bad faith (Policy, Par. 4(a)(iii)).\r\n\r\nIn all the aforementioned circumstances, Complainant finds that the disputed domain name has been registered and is used in bad faith. \r\n\r\nCAC’s and WIPO’s decisions in the following complaint proceedings support the case:\r\n\r\nCAC:\r\nCase No. 100259, ECCOSHOESSHOP.COM\r\nCase No. 100278, ECCOSHOESUK.NET\r\nCase No. 100311, UKECCOSHOES.NET\r\nCase No. 100321, ECCOSKOUDSALG.COM\r\nCase No. 100312, ECCOSALEONLINE.COM\r\nCase No. 100305, ECCOONLINESALE.COM\r\n\r\nWIPO:\r\nCase No. D2010-2038, ECCODISCOUNT.COM \r\n(http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/search\/text.jsp?case=D2010-2038) \r\nCase No. D2010-1443, ECCOBRANDSHOP.COM, ECOOSHOP.COM\r\nhttp:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/search\/text.jsp?case=D2010-1443)\r\nCase No. D2010-1113, 51ECCO.COM\r\n(http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/search\/text.jsp?case=D2010-1113)\r\nCase No. D2010-0650, ECCOSHOESOUTLET.COM, ECCOSHOESOUTLETS.COM, ECCOSHOESOUTLETS.NET \r\n(http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/amc\/en\/domains\/decisions\/text\/2010\/d2010-0650.html) ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any  other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dominik Eickemeier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2012-01-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant is the owner of the following trademarks \"ECCO\" registered in several jurisdictions worldwide for footwear:\r\n\r\nCommunity Trademark Reg. No. 001149871, reg. date 06\/02\/2003\r\nCommunity Trademark Reg. No. 002967040, reg. date 02\/05\/2007\r\nUS Trademark Reg. No. 1935123, reg. date 14\/11\/1995\r\nCanadian Trademark Reg. No. 280654, reg. date 26\/3\/1983\r\nAustralian Trademark reg. No. 375267, reg. date 10\/5\/1982\r\nChinese Trademark Reg. No. 208743, reg. date 30\/5\/1984\r\n\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ECCOSANDAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}