{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-100685",
    "time_of_filling": "2013-10-17 10:16:21",
    "domain_names": [
        "creditagricolee.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "CREDIT AGRICOLE SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Elie Eric"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nA. The Complainant’s trademark “CREDIT AGRICOLE” is a widely known trademark. Panels have confirmed the notoriety of the trademark “CREDIT AGRICOLE”.\r\n\r\nSee WIPO case No. D2010-1683 Credit Agricole S.A. v. Dick Weisz\r\nSee WIPO case No. D2012-0258 Credit Agricole S.A. v. Wang Rongxi\r\n\r\nB. Complainant’s contended main factual grounds:\r\n\r\nAccording to the Complaint, Crédit Agricole SA is the leader in retail banking in France and one of the largest banks in Europe, which can be seen at its website “www.credit-agricole.com”.\r\n\r\nCrédit Agricole SA owns several registered trademarks (word and word\/figurative trademarks) which include the wording “Credit Agricole”. Submitted evidence: WIPO Madrid registration form.\r\n\r\nCrédit Agricole SA also owns several domain names which include the wording “Credit Agricole”. Submitted evidence: Whois database registration form.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant states that the disputed domain name was registered on September 9th, 2013.\r\n\r\nOn October 9th, 2013 the Complainant sent a cease and desist letter to the e-mail address “abdellahsolo@gmail.com”. Submitted evidence: Cease and desist letter. The Complainant asserts that the stated e-mail address belongs to the Respondent. There was no response provided to the cease and desist letter.\r\n\r\nOn November 17th, 2013 the Complaint was submitted by the Complainant's authorised representative (Nameshield).\r\n\r\nNo Response was filed by the Respondent. \r\n\r\nC. Complainant’s contended main legal grounds:\r\n\r\nI. The Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name <creditagricolee.com> is confusingly similar to its registered IR trademarks.  \r\n\r\nReasons forwarded:\r\nThe disputed domain name\r\n- is phonetically, optically and conceptually similar,\r\n- contains the Complainant’s registered trademark (CREDIT AGRICOLE) in its entirety,\r\nAlso, the addition of the letter “e” and the GTLD “.com” is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks; it does not change the overall impression that the disputed domain is being connected to a trademark of “Crédit Agricole”; it does not avoid the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name <creditagricolee.com> and the Complainant, his trademark CREDIT AGRICOLE and his domain names associated.\r\n\r\nII. The Complainant alleges further that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. \r\n\r\nReasons forwarded: \r\nThe Respondent \r\n- is not affiliated with Crédit Agricole, nor authorised by Crédit Agricole SA in any way,\r\n- is not related in any way to the Complainant’s business,\r\n- does not carry out any activity for the Complainant, nor has any business with the Complainant,\r\n- did not provide response to the pending Complaint.\r\nAlso, the domain name displays no information (inactive website).\r\n\r\nIII. In additiion the Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.\r\n\r\nReasons forwarded: \r\nThe Complainant’s registered brands are well known; the domain name was only registered for the purpose of misleading and diverting inter-net traffic (typosquatting). \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Prof. Dr. Lambert Grosskopf, LL.M.Eur."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2013-11-30 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant - a well known French bank - is the registered owner of several international trademarks (IR marks) consisting of or including the expression <CREDIT AGRiCOLE>. Among those registered IR marks there is one word mark (Crédit Agricole) and two word\/figurative marks which contain the wording <CREDIT AGRICOLE>. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant also registered various domain names incorporating the expression <CREDIT AGRICOLE> under a vast selection of major top-level domains. ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "CREDITAGRICOLEE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}