{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101015",
    "time_of_filling": "2015-07-08 10:06:50",
    "domain_names": [
        "CREDIT-AGRICOLE-PARTICULIERS.COM",
        "CREDIT-AGRICOLE-PARTICULIER.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Lada Válková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "CREDIT AGRICOLE S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Brian Bond"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "Complainant states the following:\r\n\r\nComplainant is \"the leader in retail banking in France and one of the largest banks in Europe.\"  Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations, as described above, for the CREDIT AGRICOLE trademark.\r\n\r\nThe Disputed Domain Names contain the CREDIT AGRICOLE trademark \"in its entirety\"; the dash and additional words in the Disputed Domain Names are \"not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademarks and does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the trademark CREDIT AGRICOLE.\"\r\n\r\nThe Respondent \"is not affiliated with nor authorized by [Complainant] in any way\"; and Complainant \"does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent.\"\r\n\r\n\"[T]he domain name <credit-agricole-particuliers.com> points to commercial links in relation to the Complainant; and the domain name <credit-agricole-particulier.com> points to a directory containing several open Phishing kit targeting various entities (Paypal, Orange, Taxes).\"",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the disputed domain names.",
    "no_response_filed": "No administratively compliant Response has been filed.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.\r\n\r\nThe Panel notes that, on July 8, 2015, the Registrar informed CAC that the disputed domain names “are tied to a fraudulent order that slipped through our system” and that “all contact info for the domains is invalid.”",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas M. Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2015-09-01 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant states that it is the owner of the \"registered and widely known trademark CREDIT AGRICOLE.\" Complainant has provided as an annex documentation in support thereof, including printouts from the website of WIPO's Madrid International Trademark System for Reg. Nos. 1,064,647 for CREDIT AGRICOLE; 5,25,634 for CREDIT AGRICOLE; and 4,41,714 for CA CREDIT AGRICOLE. In addition, Complainant has cited a number of previous UDRP decisions in which panels have found that Complainant has rights in the CREDIT AGRICOLE trademark, including Crédit Agricole S.A. v. Donghui, WIPO Case No. D2015-0472.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "CREDIT-AGRICOLE-PARTICULIERS.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "CREDIT-AGRICOLE-PARTICULIER.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}