{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101414",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-02-28 16:13:10",
    "domain_names": [
        "tevapharma.xyz"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "RiskIQ, Inc",
    "respondent": [
        "bodson  bodson "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nAccording to the information provided Complainant Teva is a global pharmaceutical company, committed to increasing access to high-quality healthcare by developing, producing and marketing affordable generic medicines and a focused portfolio of specialty medicines. It operates in pharmaceutical markets worldwide, with a significant presence in the United States, Europe and other markets.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <tevapharma.xyz> was registered on 28 June 2016. The website to which the disputed domain name resolves mentions that the disputed domain name is for sale through Sedo for a minimum amount of USD 90. \r\n\r\nThe trademark registrations of Complainant has been issued prior to the registration of the disputed domain name.\r\nAccording to Complainant the disputed domain name is confusing similar to Complainant's trademark as it contains the trademark TEVA in its entirety.\r\n\r\nAccording to Complainant, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. Complainant has never licensed or otherwise authorized Respondent to use its TEVA mark in any fashion. Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. Complainant submits that Respondent advertises through Sedo.com that the disputed domain name is for sale with a minimum bid of  USD 90, certainly in excess of the registration costs for the disputed domain name. Complainant asserts that this does not constitute a legitimate noncommercial or other fair use of the disputed domain name.  \r\n\r\nAccording to Complainant the disputed domain name is registered and used in bad faith. The disputed domain name was registered with the intent of profiting from the trademark significance of the TEVA mark by attempting to sell the disputed domain name to the highest bidder in excess of the registration costs. Respondent is attempting to attract for commercial gain, Internet users to Respondent's web site, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the web site, and the links on the website. According to Complainant the minimum USD 90 bid that Respondent is accepting to sell the domain name is clear evidence the domain name was registered and is being used in bad-faith, with intent to profit from the trademark significance by selling it in excess of the out-of-pocket registration costs. Given the distinctiveness of Complainant's trademark, it is reasonable to infer that Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of Complainant's trademark.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dinant T.L. Oosterbaan"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-03-31 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "According to the evidence submitted by Complainant, Complainant is the owner of multiple trademarks including the European Union trademark TEVA, filing number 001192830, registration date 18 July 2000.   ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "TEVAPHARMA.XYZ": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}