{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101532",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-05-10 14:36:55",
    "domain_names": [
        "wwwtopachat.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "RueDuCommerce"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "CHAIN AVOCATS",
    "respondent": [
        "Ke  Yang"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, The RueDuCommerce Company, is a French based company and in the last eleven years the Complainant has gained an important fame among the French net surfers and consumers and it is now a major e-merchant in France.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of a portfolio of Trademarks for the course of its internet-order selling business activities on web sites accessible in particular at the following address: www.topachat.com\r\n\r\nThe Complainant owns several trademarks including the distinctive wording TOP ACHAT.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant operates its business via the domain name <topachat.com>, registered since 1999, and gets more than 8 million visits per month.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <wwwtopachat.com> was registered by the Respondent on 8 February, 2017.\r\n\r\nAt the time of this decision, the disputed domain name displays sponsored links. \r\n\r\n \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided between the same parties and relating to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Jonathan Agmon"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-06-26 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant owns several trademarks incorporating TOP ACHAT, of which the following are representative for the purposes of the present proceeding:\r\n\r\nTOP ACHAT, France trademark, registered May 4, 2004, registration number 3289599, classes 10, 20 and 21;\r\nTOP ACHAT, France trademark, registered July 6, 2011, registration number 10103067, classes 9, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;\r\nTOP ACHAT, CTM trademark, registered August 9, 2004, registration number 4034211, classes 11, 20 and 21;\r\nTOP ACHAT, CTM trademark, registered September 19, 2002, registration number 2827976, classes 9, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 and 43;\r\nTOP ACHAT, International Trademark, registered October 8, 2002, registration number 841118, classes 11, 2 and 21.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "WWWTOPACHAT.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}