{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101623",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-08-01 09:16:50",
    "domain_names": [
        "baehringer-ingelheim.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Maxime Benoist)",
    "respondent": [
        "Cimpress Schweiz GmbH"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "As the Respondent did not file any response to the complaint, the Panel took into account the following facts asserted by the Claimant (and supported by the documentary evidence submitted by the Claimant) and unchallenged by the Respondent:\r\n\r\n(a)\tThe Complainant is a German family-owned pharmaceutical group of companies with roots going back to 1885, when it was founded by Albert Boehringer (1861-1939) in Ingelheim am Rhein. Ever since, Boehringer has become a global research-driven pharmaceutical enterprise and has today about 140 affiliated companies, world-wide with roughly 46,000 employees. The two main business areas of Boehringer are Human Pharmaceuticals and Animal Health. In 2013 alone, net sales of the Boehringer group of companies amounted to about EUR 14.1 billion;\r\n\r\n(b)\tthe Complainant is the owner of the Complainant’s Trademarks;\r\n\r\n(c)\tComplainant owns multiple domain names consisting in the wording “Boehringer Ingelheim”, such as <boehringer-ingelheim.com> since 1 September 1995;\r\n\r\n(d)\tthe Disputed domain name was registered on 21 July 2017; and\r\n\r\n(e)\tRespondent is using the Disputed domain name in connection with a website which points to a parking webpage.\t\r\nThe Complainant seeks transfer of the Disputed domain name to the Complainant. \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that relate to the Disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "THE COMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nIn addition to the above factual assertions, the Complainant also contends the following:\r\n\r\n(i)\tDisputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Trademarks;\r\n\r\n(ii)\tDisputed domain name is also a clear case of \"typosquatting“, i.e. the Disputed domain name contains an obvious misspelling of the Complainant’s Trademarks;\r\n\r\n(iii)\tthe Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant nor authorized by it in any way to use Complainant’s Trademarks. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent; \r\n\r\n(iv)\tthe Disputed domain name displays a parking page. It demonstrates a lack of legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed domain name;\r\n\r\n(v)\tregistering the Disputed domain name with the misspelling of the Complainant’s Trademark was intentional attempt to create confusing similarity with the Complainant’s trademarks and thus the registration was done in bad faith; and\r\n\r\n(vi)\tthe Disputed domain name has been registered by the Respondent in an effort to take advantage of the good reputation Complainant had built in its BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM® trademarks, with the sole aim to create a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s Trademarks and domain names.\r\n\r\nTHE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not provide any response to the complaint.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Panel concluded that the Disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Trademarks within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (\"UDRP\" or \"Policy\").\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed domain name within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".\r\n",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".\r\n",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Michal Matějka"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-08-30 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the registered owner of international word trademark “Boehringer-Ingelheim.”, reg. no. 221544, registered on 2 July 1959 for goods and services in classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 16, 17, 19, 29, 30 and 32 and U.S. word trademark reg.no. 641166 “BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM“, registered on 5 February 1957 for goods and services in class 5 (“Complainant’s Trademarks”).\r\n\r\nThe Disputed domain name <baehringer-ingelheim.com> was registered on 21 July 2017.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BAEHRINGER-INGELHEIM.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}