{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101621",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-07-28 11:09:50",
    "domain_names": [
        "honeylovetoys.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Lovehoney Group Limited"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "BrandIT GmbH",
    "respondent": [
        "Jordan"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\ni)\tABOUT COMPLAINANT AND THE BRAND LOVEHONEY\r\n\r\nThe Complainant (\"Lovehoney\") is the owner of the LOVEHONEY trademarks.  These trademark registrations predate the registration of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nFounded in 2002, Lovehoney is now the largest online sex toy retailer in the UK and is growing rapidly internationally as a retailer, manufacturer and distributor. Lovehoney’s website and sex toy brands are known and loved around the world. \r\n\r\nDue to being an online business with extensive use, advertising and revenue associated with its trademarks worldwide, the Complainant enjoys a high degree of renown around the world, particularly in the adult products industry, including in China where the Respondent is located.  \r\n\r\nThe Complainant has registered a number of domain names under generic Top-Level Domains (\"gTLD\") and country-code Top-Level Domains (\"ccTLD\") containing the term “LOVEHONEY”, for example, <lovehoney.com> (created on December 1, 1998), <lovehoney.net> (created on December 5, 2001) and lovehoney.us (created on April 30, 2006). Complainant uses these domain names to connect to websites through which it informs potential customers about its LOVEHONEY mark and its products and services.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided related to the disputed domain name. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT'S CONTENTIONS: \r\n\r\nI. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's registered LOVEHONEY trademarks.\r\n\r\nThe manner in which the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the protected mark: \r\nMisspelling\/Typosquatting \u2028\r\nConceptual\/intellectual similarity \u2028\r\nMark combined with generic term \u2028\r\nHaving regard to the website or other extraneous material to determine if the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark\r\n\r\nII. The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant refers to the following category of issues involved:\u2028 \r\n\r\nDiversion of consumers\/trademark tarnishment \r\n\r\nIII. The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith: \r\n\r\nThe Complainant refers to the following categories of issues involved: \r\n\r\nNo response to cease and desist letter \u2028\r\nOther commercial gain \u2028\r\nAttracting internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant \u2028\r\nSubstantial similarity between website associated with the disputed domain name and website associated with right holder’s domain names.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant in particular emphasises that the Complainant's registered LOVEHONEY trademarks predate the registration of the disputed domain name. The Complainant also emphasises that the disputed domain name incorporates a reversed version of the Complainant’s well­known LOVEHONEY trademarks, i.e. “honeylove” along with the word “toys”, which is closely and intrinsically linked to Complainant’s business.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.\r\n\r\n",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-09-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the registered owner of the EU trademark “LOVEHONEY” No. 003400298 (word mark; registration date: 17 January 2005; application date: 10 October 2003; classes 3, 5, 10, 25, 28, 35). The Complainant is also the registered owner of the international trademark “LOVEHONEY” No. 1091529 (word mark; registration date: 27 June 2011; application date: 27 June 2011; classes 3, 5, 10, 25, 28, 35) (Designations under Madrid Protocol: AU-CH-CN-IS-NO-NZ). These trademarks are hereafter referred to as the \"LOVEHONEY trademarks\". ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "HONEYLOVETOYS.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}