{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101628",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-08-07 10:36:51",
    "domain_names": [
        "boehringer-ingeelheim.com",
        "boehringer-ingelheiim.com",
        "boehrinnger-ingelheiimm.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Aneta Jelenová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Paris Baker"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "Complainant states the following (internal citations omitted):\r\n\r\n\"The Complainant is a German family-owned pharmaceutical group of companies with roots going back to 1885, when it was founded by Albert Boehringer (1861-1939) in Ingelheim am Rhein.\r\n\r\n\"Ever since, Boehringer has become a global research-driven pharmaceutical enterprise and has today about 140 affiliated companies world-wide with roughly 46,000 employees. The two main business areas of Boehringer are: Human Pharmaceuticals and Animal Health. In 2013 alone, net sales of the Boehringer group of companies amounted to about EUR 14.1 billion.\r\n\r\n\"The Complainant owns a large portfolio of trademarks including the wording 'BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM' in several countries, such as the BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM® international registration number 221544 since July 2nd 1959, and also the trademark BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM number 568844 covering Switzerland registered on 1991-03-22.\r\n\r\n\"Furthermore, the Complainant owns multiple domain names consisting in the wording 'Boehringer Ingelheim', such as <boehringer-ingelheim.com> since 1995-09-01 and <boehringeringelheim.com> since 2004-07-04....\r\n\r\n\"The disputed domain names <boehringer-ingeelheim.com>, <boehringer-ingelheiim.com>, <boehrinnger-ingelheiimm.com> were registered the same day on July 25th, 2017.\"\r\n\r\nComplainant has provided, inter alia, the following legal grounds (internal citations omitted):\r\n\r\nWith respect to 4(a)(i): \"[T]he disputed domain names constitutes a misspelled word of the Complainant’s registered trademark BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM....\r\n\r\n\"This is thus a clear case of 'typosquatting', i.e. the disputed domain name contains an obvious misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark.\"\r\n\r\nWith respect to paragraph 4(a)(ii): \"The Complainant states that the Respondent is not affiliated with him nor authorized by him in any way. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant's trademark, or apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent....\r\n\r\n\"The disputed domain names point to an [in]active website ('403 forbidden').\r\n\r\n\"It demonstrates a lack of legitimate interests in respect of the domain name because it is not used.\"\r\n\r\nWith respect to paragraph 4(a)(iii): \"[B]y registering the domain names with the misspelling of the Trademark BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, the Complainant can state that this practical was intentionally designed to be confusingly similar with the Complainant’s trademarks....\r\n\r\n\"[G]iven the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain names with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademarks.\"\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "No administratively compliant Response has been filed.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas M. Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-09-21 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant owns a large portfolio of trademarks including the wording “BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM” in several countries, such as the BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM® international registration number 221544 since July 2, 1959, and also the trademark BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM number 568844 covering Switzerland registered on March 22, 1991.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Complainant owns multiple domain names consisting in the wording “Boehringer Ingelheim”, such as <boehringer-ingelheim.com> since September 1, 1995, and <boehringeringelheim.com> since July 4, 2004.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOEHRINGER-INGEELHEIM.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIIM.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "BOEHRINNGER-INGELHEIIMM.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}