{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101669",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-09-06 11:00:01",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelorrnittal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ArcelorMittal (Société Anonyme)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Anne Morin)",
    "respondent": [
        "Nicholas Lapez"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\n\r\nThe Complainant specialises in and uses its international trade mark no 947686 ARCELORMITTAL for its steel production services. \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name registered in 2017 is attached to a parking page and has not been used for an active web site since its registration. \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant assert the following:\r\n\r\n-\t“The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark. Simply replacing the letter 'M' with the letters 'R' and 'N' is not sufficient to distinguish the disputed domain name from the Complainant's mark. The gTLD .com does not change the overall impression of the disputed domain name and it is still confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark. “\r\n\r\n-\t“The Respondent has no relationship with the Complainant's business and has not been authorised by the Complainant to use the Complainant's mark. The Domain Name has not been put to any use and this cannot be a bona fide offering of goods or services. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. “\r\n\r\n-\t“The disputed domain name is attached to a parking page and has not been used for an active web site since its registration. Typosquatting and passive holding of a domain name containing a famous mark is bad faith. “\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dawn Osborne"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-09-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of international trade mark no 947686 ARCELORMITTAL registered on August 03, 2007 in Classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42 with priority June 18, 2005. ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCELORRNITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}