{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101676",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-09-13 08:39:43",
    "domain_names": [
        "INTESASANPAOLOVERIFICA.NET"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "Kara  Turner"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena. The Complainant is the company resulting from the merger between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two of the top Italian banking groups.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 47,5 billion euro, and the leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of several domain names and trademarks containing the words \"“INTESA SANPAOLO”.\r\n\r\nOn September 5, 2017, the Respondent registered the Disputed domain name INTESASANPAOLOVERIFICA.NET.\r\n\r\nThe Disputed domain name was connected to a webpage reproducing the Complainant’s trademark and website layout and is currently blocked by Google Safe Browsing through a warning page.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contains that the Respondent has no rights to the Disputed domain name, since the Respondent Kara Turner has nothing to do with the Complainant Intesa Sanpaolo. Nobody has been authorized or licensed by the Complainant to use the Disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant furthermore states that its trademark “INTESA SANPAOLO” is distinctive and well known all around the world. The fact that the Respondent has registered a domain name that is confusingly similar to it indicates that the Respondent had knowledge of the Complainant’s trademarks at the time of registration of the Disputed domain name. \r\n\r\nIn addition, the Disputed domain name is in the view of Complainant not used for any bone fide offerings, considering that the same is connected to a website which has been blocked by Google Safe Browsing through a warning page.\r\n\r\nComplainant states that it is clear that the main purpose of the Respondent was to use the website for “phishing” financial information in an attempt to defraud the Complainant’s customers, which is a clear evidence of bad faith. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, another aim of the Respondent might be to resell the Disputed domain name to the Complainant, which represents an evidence of the registration and use in bad faith, according to par. 4(b)(i) of the Policy.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the Disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Jan Christian Schnedler, LL.M."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-10-18 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant uses the domain names bearing the sign “INTESA SANPAOLO”: “INTESASANPAOLO.COM, .ORG, .EU, .INFO, .NET, .BIZ” and INTESA-SANPAOLO.COM, .ORG, .EU, .INFO, .NET, .BIZ”. All of them are connected to the official website of the Complainant.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is furthermore the owner of the following registrations for the trademark “INTESA SANPAOLO” \r\n\r\n- International trademark registration no. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, granted on March 07, 2007, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;\r\n- EU trademark registration no. 005301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, granted on June 18, 2007, in classes 35, 36 and 38;\r\n- EU trademark registration no. 005421177 “INTESA SANPAOLO & device”, granted on November 5, 2007 in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "INTESASANPAOLOVERIFICA.NET": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}