{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101673",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-09-26 10:19:04",
    "domain_names": [
        "highsnobietys.top"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Aneta Jelenová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Titel Media GmbH"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Lubberger Lehment ",
    "respondent": [
        "chen  yunfu"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "As the Respondent did not file any response to the complaint, the Panel took into account the following facts asserted by the Complainant (and supported by the documentary evidence submitted by the Complainant) and unchallenged by the Respondent:\r\n\r\n(a)\tIn 2005, the Complainant launched the website <highsnobiety.com> – an online platform covering forthcoming trends and news in fashion, art, music and culture. Its first corresponding print issue was published in summer 2010. The website <hisghsnobiety.com> has steadily built a strong brand in the online fashion and lifestyle world. Sneakers and footwear represents a big part of the fashion-section. Today the blog and print magazines are among the most visited global sources for inspiration in the areas of fashion, sneakers, music, art and lifestyle culture;\r\n\r\n(b)\tthe Complainant is the owner of the Complainant’s Trademarks;\r\n\r\n(c)\tthe Disputed domain name was registered on 12 January 2017; and\r\n\r\n(d)\tthe Respondent has offered counterfeit products (sneakers) on the website operated under the Disputed domain name. The Respondent, thus, obviously tries to sell counterfeit products to consumers under the well-known Complainant’s Trademarks.\t\r\n\r\nThe Complainant seeks transfer of the Disputed domain name to the Complainant. ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that relate to the Disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "THE COMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nIn addition to the above factual assertions, the Complainant also contends the following:\r\n\r\n(i)\tDisputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Trademarks;\r\n\r\n(ii)\tthe Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant nor authorized by it in any way to use Complainant’s Trademarks. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Therefore the Respondent has no legitimate interest in the Disputed domain name; \r\n\r\n(iii)\tthe use of Disputed domain name could easily mislead and make consumers believe that the domain belongs to the Complainant. This is even more applicable when considering that under the domain in question, <highsnobietys.top>, sneakers and other footwear are being offered, which also constitutes a big part of the content which is available on the original online-platform of the Complainant <highsnobiety.com>. This in connection with the fact that the Respondent sells counterfeit products under the Disputed domain name clearly evidences bad faith of the Respondent upon registration and use of the Disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nTHE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not provide any response to the complaint.",
    "rights": "The Panel concluded that the Disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Trademarks within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (\"UDRP\" or \"Policy\").\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed domain name within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the Disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Michal Matějka"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2017-11-09 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the registered owner of international word trademark reg. no. 1306247 “High Snobiety”, with priority date of 13 January 2016, registered in classes 9, 16, 25, 35, 38 and 41 and EU figurative trademark reg. no. 15143498 “HIGH SNOBIETY”, with filing date of 24 February 2016, in classes 9, 16, 25, 35, 38 and 41. (“Complainant’s Trademarks”).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "HIGHSNOBIETYS.TOP": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}