{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101811",
    "time_of_filling": "2017-12-15 09:35:48",
    "domain_names": [
        "amundi-asset.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "AMUNDI S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Kempen Co"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant finds that Respondent is not commonly known by the domain name under paragraph 4(c)(ii)of the UDRP Policy. \r\n\r\nSee IndyMac Bank F.S.B. v. Eshback, FA 830934 (Forum Dec. 7, 2006) (finding that the Respondent failed to establish rights and legitimate interests in the <emitmortgage.com> domain name as the Respondent was not authorized to register domain names featuring the Complainant’s mark and failed to submit evidence of that it is commonly known by the disputed domain name).\r\n\r\nSee Compagnie de Saint Gobain v. Com-Union Corp., D2000-0020 (WIPO Mar. 14, 2000) (finding no rights or legitimate interest where the respondent was not commonly known by the mark and never applied for a license or permission from the Complainant to use the trademarked name).\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name points to a parking page with commercial links (“PPC”) in relation to the Complainant and its competitors. \r\n\r\nSee Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. domain admin \/ private registrations aktien gesellschaft, FA1506001626253 (Forum July 29, 2015) (“Respondent is using the disputed domain name to resolve to a web page containing advertising links to products that compete with those of Complainant.  The Panel finds that this does not constitute a bona fide offering or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use.”).  \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "José Ignacio San Martín"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-01-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant´s group is the owner of International Trademark 1024160 AMUNDI, for services in class 36, dated 24 September 2009.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "AMUNDI-ASSET.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}