{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101962",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-04-20 09:37:17",
    "domain_names": [
        "avastcenter.com",
        "avastio.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Avast Software s.r.o."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Rudolf Leška (Rudolf Leška, advokát)",
    "respondent": [
        "Victor Chernyshov"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, Avast Software s.r.o., is a Czech multinational cybersecurity software company headquartered in the Czech Republic. The Complainant has more than 400 million customers using its products and the largest market share among anti-malware application vendors worldwide. The Complainant possesses a market share of more than one fifth of the global antivirus market. The Complainant has more than 1,600 employees across its headquarters in the Czech Republic and its offices in Europe, North America and Asia. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of the registered word mark AVAST in several classes in numerous countries all over the world, including Russia.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names <avastcenter.com> and <avastio.com> have been registered by the Respondent on May 10, 2017 and May 26, 2017 respectively, using a proxy service. The disputed domain name <avastcenter.com> currently does not resolve to an active website. The disputed domain name used to resolve to a website containing the Complainant's trademark and logo and displaying a large icon to \"DOWNLOAD FOR FREE\" the Complainant's Antivirus Avast software. The disputed domain name <avastio.com> resolves to a webpage comprising of a single line of English text stating \"Avast- world's FIRST free antivirus\". \r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of other proceedings commenced or decided in relation to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant considers the disputed domain names to be confusingly similar to trademarks in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. According to the Complainant, the Respondent does not use the disputed domain names in connection with any legitimate use. Also, according to the Complainant, the Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain names. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the Respondent knew, or at least should have known, of the existence of the Complainant’s trademarks and uses the disputed domain names to trade on the Complainant’s goodwill and reputation. The Complainant further contends that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain Internet users to its website or other online location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of its website or location or of a product or service on its website or location.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-06-06 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the holder of trademark rights for the word mark AVAST, registered in numerous jurisdictions, including Russia (e.g. international registration No. 838439 since June 22, 2004, duly renewed, and covering products in classes 9 and 42; and Russian registration No. 627412 since August 22, 2017, covering products in classes 9 and 42).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "AVASTCENTER.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "AVASTIO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}