{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-101989",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-05-09 09:22:52",
    "domain_names": [
        "kryviy-arcelormittal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Sandra Lanczová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Jeton Heta"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": "Jeton Heta",
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is a large steel production company that markets steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliance, and the packaging industries in more than 60 countries around the world. The Complainant contends that its trademark ARCELORMITTAL is a well-known and enjoys an excellent reputation worldwide. \r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\nThe Complainant's Ukrainian subsidiary resides in the Ukrainian city of Kryviy Rih and is named \"PJSC Arcelormittal Kryvyi Rih\". Therefore the Complainant contends that the addition of the geographic term “kryviy” (part of the name of the Ukrainian city Kryviy Rih) and the gTLD to the mark is not sufficient to avoid the likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademark. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant argues that the Respondent has no legitimate rights or interests in the domain name; the Respondent is not known as the disputed domain name, but rather as “Domains By Proxy, LLC”, and has not acquired any right in the trademark. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant also asserts that since the Whois information regarding the disputed domain name shows the Respondent's name is not similar to the disputed domain name, the Respondent cannot claim it is known under the disputed domain name. \r\n\r\nCurrently, the disputed domain name redirects to the Complainant's official website, this, argues the Complainant is a bad faith use and evidence of bad faith registration. \r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\nThe Respondent did not file a Response.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Jonathan Agmon"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-06-17 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of International Trademark Registration No. 947686, ARCELORMITTAL, registered on August 9, 2007;\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a holder of several domain names,  including the domain name <ARCELORMITTAL.COM>, registered on January 27, 2006.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "KRYVIY-ARCELORMITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}