{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102027",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-05-28 09:10:06",
    "domain_names": [
        "saint-gobin.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Milen Radumilo"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a French company specialised in the production, processing and distribution of materials.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is organized in three Sectors: Innovative Materials, Construction Products and Building Distribution. \r\n\r\nFor 350 years, the Complainant has consistently demonstrated its ability to invent products that improve quality of life. It is now one of the top 100 industrial groups in the world and one of the 100 most innovative companies. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of several trademarks SAINT-GOBAIN®, such as the international trademark SAINT-GOBAIN n°551682 registered since 21 July 1989.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also owns many domain names which include its trademark SAINT-GOBAIN, such as the domain name <saint-gobain.com> registered since 29 December 1995.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <saint-gobin.com> was registered on 19 May 2018.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name points to a parking page with commercial links (“PPC”).",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-07-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "",
    "decision_domains": {
        "SAINT-GOBIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}