{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102086",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-07-13 09:35:27",
    "domain_names": [
        "amundi6ee.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "AMUNDI S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "White & Case"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nIt is well-established that “a domain name that wholly incorporates a Complainant’s registered trademark may be sufficient to establish confusing similarity for purposes of the UDRP”. Please see WIPO Case No. D2003-0888, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. Vasiliy Terkin.\r\n\r\nPlease see for instance NAF Case No. FA 918556, Disney Enters., Inc. v. Kamble (“The Panel finds that Respondent is redirecting Internet users interested in Complainant’s products and services to its own website for commercial gain and that such use does not fall within the parameters of a bona fide offering of goods or services pursuant to par. 4(c)(i) of the Policy or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use pursuant to par. 4(c)(iii) of the Policy.”)\r\n\r\nPlease see WIPO Case No. D2009-0776, Aspen Holdings Inc. v. Rick Natsch, Potrero Media Corporation (“the Respondent cannot establish rights or legitimate interests through the use of a disputed domain name with a pay-per-click landing page containing links to ads that relate to the Complainant's area of commercial activity, thus manifesting an intent to exploit and profit from the Complainant's mark.”)\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends the trademark AMUNDI® is well-known. Please see:\r\n-\tCAC case n° 101596, AMUNDI v. Lukas Kadys <amundiuk.com> (“The disputed domain name has not been used. Inactive use of a domain name containing the well-known mark of a Complainant has been widely held to amount to registration and use in bad faith.”)\r\n-\tCAC case n° 101803, AMUNDI v. John Crawford (“The trademark of Complainant has been existing for a long time and is well-known. Respondent knew or should have known that the disputed domain name included Complainant’s trademark.”)\r\n\r\nPlease see for instance FORUM Case No. 1704957, Pearson Education Limited and Pearson plc v. Hong young jin (“As stated previously, Respondent’s domain name resolves to a website hosting links and advertisements related to Complainant’s education business and PTE marks. […] Attempting to use a disputed domain name to profit from an Internet user’s mistaken associations with a complainant demonstrates bad faith under Policy 4(b)(iv). […]. The Panel finds that Respondent demonstrated bad faith pursuant to Policy 4(b)(iv).”).",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "There are no other legal proceedings the Panel is aware of which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy). ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy). ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Ho-Hyun Nahm, Esq."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-08-07 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of the international trademark n°1024160 AMUNDI registered on September 24, 2009.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is also the owner of domain names including the trademark AMUNDI, such as <amundi.com> registered and used since August 26, 2004 and <amundi-ee.com> registered on September 24, 2009.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "AMUNDI6EE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}