{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102072",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-06-29 13:01:38",
    "domain_names": [
        "mirapex.club"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Sandra Lanczová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOEHRINGER Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Artem Tsvetkov"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant has been engaged in pharmaceutical research since 1885. The “MIRAPEX” pills have been a trustworthy treatment against Parkinson’s disease for over 12 years and are FDA approved. \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on March 20th 2018.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant relies upon several registered “MIRAPEX” Trademarks. The Complainant has registered a number of Trademarks in the European Union and in the USA for services in class 5.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The panel is not informed of other legal proceedings relating to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the disputed domain name  is identical to its trademark and domain name registrations.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Complainant alleges that the Respondent does not have any legal rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and is not related to the Complainant’s business in any way.\r\n\r\nFinally, the Complainant argues that the disputed domain name was registered and used in bad faith by the Respondent. According to the Complainant, the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name to take advantage of the reputation of Complainant’s trademarks and for commercial gain. Moreover, the Complainant argues that the fact that the disputed domain name resolves to a webpage featuring adult content might contribute to a loss of value and reputation for the “MIRAPEX” Trademarks.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent states that he does not need the disputed domain name.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Nathalie Dreyfus"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-08-07 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant owns numerous Trademarks containing the term “MIRAPEX”, including but not limited to:\r\n-\tEuropean Trademark “MIRAPEX” No. 003364585 registered on January 25th 2006 and duly renewed \r\n-\tUS Trademark “MIRAPEX” No. 2062274 registered on May 13th, 1997 and duly renewed. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant also uses several domain names, including <mirapex.com> which is connected to the Complainant’s official website.\r\n\r\nThis is not contested by the Respondent.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "MIRAPEX.CLUB": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}