{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102162",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-09-18 08:57:23",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelormittals.space"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "stave co ltd"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nSee similar case ARCELORMITTAL vs. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd, CAC case n° 101020 (“The addition of ‘S’ in <arcelomittals.com> […] does not avoid the conclusion that the domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark ARCELORMITTAL”).\r\n\r\nSee CAC case n° 101270, ARCELORMITTAL vs. Le Tien (“The incorporation of the well-known ARCELORMITTAL trademarks into the Domain Name, in combination with the fact that the website under the Domain Name has been inactive since its registration, shows the bad faith of the Respondent and absence of rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent.”).\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "CAC case n° 101020 - ARCELORMITTAL vs. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd, \r\n\r\nCAC case n° 101270 - ARCELORMITTAL vs. Le Tien",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.  ",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. E.J.V.T. van den Broek"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-10-15 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "IR wordmark ARCELORMITTAL, reg. no. 79047805, reg. date August 3, 2007\r\n\r\nIR wordmark ARCELORMITTAL, reg. no. 77717895, reg. date April 20, 2009\r\n\r\nEU wordmark ArcelorMittal, reg. no. 0947686, reg. date August 3, 2007 \r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCELORMITTALS.SPACE": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}