{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102165",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-09-18 09:47:22",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelormnittal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "Pavla WoolDridge "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is a large steel production company that markets steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliance, and the packaging industries in more than 60 countries around the world. The Complainant contends that its trademark ARCELORMITTAL is a well-known and enjoys an excellent reputation worldwide.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark on the basis that the addition of the letter “n” to its trademark, ARCELORMITTAL, and the gTLD “.com” are insufficient to avoid the likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant also contends that the disputed domain name has wholly incorporated its trademark, thereby establishing confusing similarity under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also argues that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant nor did the Complainant license or authorize the Respondent to use its trademark. The disputed domain name also resolves to an inactive website since its registration.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant further asserts that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith as the Respondent must have known of the Complainant’s trademark given its reputation. The disputed domain name also resolves to an inactive website since its registration.\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\nThe Respondent did not file a Response.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Jonathan Agmon"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-10-17 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of International Registration No. 0947686, ARCELORMITTAL, registered on August 3, 2007; US Registration No. 3908649, ARCELORMITTAL, registered on January 18, 2011; \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a holder of several domain names, including the domain name <ARCELORMITTAL.COM>, registered on January 27, 2006.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCELORMNITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}