{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102161",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-09-18 09:46:05",
    "domain_names": [
        "uk-arcelormittal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "james"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, ArcelorMittal S.A., is the world's largest steel producer. The Complainant produces and supplies steel for use in the automotive industry, construction, household appliances and packaging with operations in more than 60 countries. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of the registered word mark ARCELORMITTAL in several classes in numerous countries all over the world, including the United States.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name  has been registered on September 2, 2018 by the Respondent. The disputed domain name currently does not resolve to an active website.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "COMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to trademarks in which it has rights. The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name in connection with any legitimate use. Also, according to the Complainant, the Respondent has not been authorized to register or use the disputed domain name. Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the Respondent knew, or at least should have known, of the existence of the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant further contends that the incorporation of the Complainant’s famous trademark in the disputed domain name by the Respondent coupled with an inactive website evidences bad faith registration and use.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Flip Petillion"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-10-24 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the holder of trademark rights for the word mark ARCELORMITTAL, registered in numerous jurisdictions, including the United States (e.g. international registration No. 947686 since August 3, 2007, duly renewed, and covering products in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "UK-ARCELORMITTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}