{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102174",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-09-24 10:59:26",
    "domain_names": [
        "novatriis.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Novartis AG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "BrandIT GmbH",
    "respondent": [
        "Ladonna Compton"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant contends due to extensive use, advertising and revenue associated with its trademarks worldwide, the Complainant enjoys a high degree of renown around the world, including in the United States, where the Respondent is located. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant points out previously successfully challenged several NOVARTIS domain names through UDRP proceedings. In these proceedings Panels have confirmed that NOVARTIS is a well-known worldwide trademark and is directly connected to the Complainant’s activities in the pharmaceutical business (WIPO cases: D2016-1688; D2016-0552; D2015-1989; D2015-1250).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant asserts that the Complainant has never granted the Respondent any right to use the NOVARTIS trademark within the domain name, nor is the Respondent affiliated to the Complainant in any form.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant points out that the Respondent has sent a fraudulent e-mail to a third party from the e-mail address rupam_s.chowdhury@novatriis.com on July 19, 2018, impersonating personnel from the Complainant and asking for invoices. Such conduct shows, the Complainant set forth that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name for the purpose of sending phishing e-mails instead of bona fide offering of goods or services.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also shows that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name with a privacy shield, and at the time of preparing the Complaint, the disputed domain name is not active.  \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Prof. Dr. Lambert Grosskopf, LL.M.Eur."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-11-04 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant - a well known global healthcare company based in Switzerland - is the registered owner of a large number of trademarks in numerous of countries all over the world, i.e. trademarks egistered in United States of America NOVARTIS (Reg. no: 4986124 \/ Reg. no: 2997235).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant has registered also a number of domain names containing the term “NOVARTIS”, for example, <novartis.com> (created on April 2, 1996) and <novartis.net> (created on April 25, 1998).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "NOVATRIIS.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}