{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102223",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-11-09 11:38:48",
    "domain_names": [
        "majeboutique.online"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "MAJE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Charles  Lamontagne"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nMaje was Created in 1998 and it is specialized in ready-to-wear collections and accessories for women. As a part of the SMCP group, the Complainant has a worldwide presence, with 484 points of sale as of December 2017.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent is the owner of the disputed domain name which was registered on October 20th, 2018 . The website in relation with the disputed domain name displays the Complainant’s trademark MAJE® and entitle its homepage “MAJE | Vêtements et accessoires” (which means “MAJE | Clothing and accessories”). \r\n\r\nThe Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its prior trademark MAJE® and its domain names associated. Indeed, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant’s registered international trademark MAJE® in its entirety.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the addition of the term \"BOUTIQUE\" without space or hyphen at the beginning of the disputed domain name is not sufficient to escape the finding that it is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark and does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the trademark MAJE®.\r\nIn further, the addition of the English words “BOUTIQUE” increases the likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademarks and activity, because “BOUTIQUE” refers to the Complainant activity, as this term refers to the boutiques the Complainant owns all around the world.\r\n\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Massimo Cimoli"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-12-17 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks “MAJE”:\r\n- the trademark MAJE® n° 801247, registered since November 28th, 2002, and duly renewed for the classes 9, 14, 18 and 25; \r\n- the trademark MAJE® n° 998746, registered since February 6th, 2009 for the class 3;\r\n- the figurative trademark MAJE® n° 1370546, registered since July 20th, 2017 for the classes: 3, 9, 14, 18 and 25.\r\nHowever the Complainant has chosen, as a Mutual Jurisdiction, that one of the Registrar which is the US Jurisdiction being the registrar a Los Angeles Compmany. The first two International Registrations do not cover USA  on the contrary Reg.1370546 for the stylised  trademark MAJE   in classes 3; 9; 14; 18 and 25 covers USAand it appears valid at this moment in time.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also owns an important domain names portfolio containing the trademark MAJE®, such as the domain name <maje.com> registered and used since December 12th, 1996 \r\n\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "MAJEBOUTIQUE.ONLINE": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}