{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102227",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-11-16 09:15:18",
    "domain_names": [
        "vinci-faci1ities.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "VINCI S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Susan Patrick"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "VINCI S.A. (the Complainant) is a leading player in concessions and construction, operating in some 100 countries. In 2017, with around 194.000 employees and 3.000 business units, its revenue amounted to 40.2 billion euros. \r\n\r\nAs a part of the VINCI GROUP, VINCI FACILITIES provides facility management services for buildings and their occupants, such as ensuring building maintenance with the technical expertise of its teams and enhancing the potential value of real estate assets or performing multitechnical maintenance.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant has duly proved to be the owner of two trademarks containing the wording VINCI FACILITIES. Furthermore, the Complainant states to be the owner, through its subsidiary VINCI ENERGIES SYSTEMES D INFORMATION, of several domain names containing the trademark VINCI FACILITIES, such as <vincifacilities.com> registered and used since April 26, 2010. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant informs that the disputed domain name <vinci-faci1ities.com> has been registered only on November 12, 2018 and that it merely redirects to a parking page with commercial links, some of them related to the Complainant.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant states that the disputed domain name <vinci-faci1ities.com> is confusingly similar to its trademark VINCI FACILITIES since (i) the addition of a dash and (ii) the substitution of letter “L” by the number “1” in the trademark VINCI FACILITIES are not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark VINCI FACILITIES. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant also contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Complainant informs that it does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent and that, as a consequence, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests on the disputed domain name <vinci-faci1ities.com>.\r\n\r\nIn addition, the Complainant contends that the mere addition of the dash and substitution of the letter “L” by the number \"1\" demonstrate a clear case of typosquatting, which is evidence of bad faith registration and use.\r\n\r\nFinally the Complainant notes that the website in connection with the disputed domain name <vinci-faci1ities.com> consists of a parking page with commercial links, some of them related to the Complainant, and this circumstance demonstrates that the Respondent has attempt to attract Internet users for commercial gain to his own website thanks to the Complainant’s trademarks.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Avv. Guido Maffei"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2018-12-14 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks. In particular, Vinci S.A. owns:\r\n\r\na) EUTM No. 8203531 VINCI FACILITIES (device) registered on November 22, 2009 for classes 35, 36 and 37;\r\n\r\nb) EUTM No. 9381385 VINCI FACILITIES (device) registered on March 1, 2011 for classes 9, 38, 39, 41, 42 and 45.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "VINCI-FACI1ITIES.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}