{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102232",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-11-28 09:59:48",
    "domain_names": [
        "intesabancasapaolo.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "Milen Radumilo"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "Complainant states that it is “the leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena”; that it is “among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 34,2 billion euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management)”; that it has “a network of approximately 4,400 branches” serving “approximately 11,9 million customers… in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India.”\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was created on September 22, 2018, and is being used in connection with a website that offers links to services competitive with Complainant.\r\n\r\nComplainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy: Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the INTESA SANPAOLO Trademark because, inter alia, the domain name “exactly reproduces the wording ‘INTESA SANPAOLO’, with the deletion of letter ‘n’ in the verbal portion ‘Sanpaolo’ and the addition of the word ‘banca’ (the Italian for ‘bank’) between the verbal portions ‘Intesa’ and ‘Sanpaolo’”; and “[c]onsidering the banking and financial context in which the Complainant operates, it is undeniable that INTESABANCASAPAOLO.COM will result even more confusingly similar to the business carried out under the trademark ‘INTESA SANPAOLO’, as it will be interpreted by internet users as a reference to the safety of Complainant’s internet banking.”\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy: Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name because, inter alia, “PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC has nothing to do with Intesa Sanpaolo”; “any use of the trademark ‘INTESA SANPAOLO’ has to be authorized by the Complainant”; “[n]obody has been authorized or licensed by the above-mentioned banking group to use the domain name at issue”; “[t]he domain name at stake does not correspond to the name of the Respondent and, to the best of [Complainant’s] knowledge, PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC is definitely not commonly known as ‘INTESABANCASAPAOLO’”; and Complainant “do[es] not find any fair or non-commercial uses of the domain name at stake.”\r\n\r\nParagraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy: Complainant states that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith because, inter alia, the INTESA SANPAOLO Trademark “is distinctive and well known all around the world”; “the domain name is connected to a website sponsoring, among others, banking and financial services, for whom the Complainant’s trademarks are registered and used”; and Respondent did not respond to a demand letter sent by Complainant on October 17, 2018.    ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "No administratively compliant response has been filed.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas M. Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-01-02 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant states, and provides evidence to support, that it is the owner of certain trademark registrations that consist of or contain the mark INTESA SANPAOLO (the “INTESA SANPAOLO Trademark”), including Int’l Reg. No. 920,896 for the mark INTESA SANPAOLO (registered March 7, 2007) and EU Reg. No. 5,301,999 for the mark INTESA SANPAOLO (registered September 8, 2006).",
    "decision_domains": {
        "INTESABANCASAPAOLO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}