{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102235",
    "time_of_filling": "2018-11-28 11:17:17",
    "domain_names": [
        "amundipoineer.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Fundacion Comercio Electronico"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is a subsidiary jointly created in 2010 by Crédit Agricole and Société Générale to regroup their asset management activities. The Complainant states that it ranks in the worldwide top 10 companies in the asset management industry, with more than 100 million customers worldwide. The Complainant has offices in 37 countries across the world. It manages over 1,4 trillion euros of assets across six investment hubs. Such facts are not contested by the Respondent. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant has also shown that it owns valid trademark rights in France as well as several domain name registrations.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent registered the disputed domain name, <amundi-poineer.com> on November 19, 2018.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings, pending or decided, relating to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name should be transferred because each of the three elements required in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy has been established.\r\n\r\nFirstly, the Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the protected trademark.  Complainant states that the mere inversion of the letters “I” and “O” in the disputed domain name, as well as in the gTLD <.com>, is not sufficient  to dispel the likelihood of confusion. According to the Complainant, such a slight difference in the order of the letters makes it a case of typosquatting. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Complainant refers to a CAC decision which acknowledged its rights in the sign “AMUNDI PIONEER” (CAC Case No. 101483, AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT v. Syed Hussain \/ Domain Management MIC, <amundipioneer.com>).\r\n\r\nSecondly, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights nor legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. The Complainant claims that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name because the WHOIS information is not similar to the disputed domain name. Also, the Complainant claims that it has no affiliation with the Respondent and that the latter has not been licensed or authorized by the Complainant to use its trademark. \r\n\r\nIn addition, the Complainant provides a screenshot of the disputed domain name dated November 21, 2018 which shows that the disputed domain name redirects to a parking page featuring several pay-per-click links. The Complainant states that such use of the domain name is not a bona fide offering of goods and services nor is it a legitimate noncommercial or fair use.\r\n\r\nFinally, the Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith because the misspelling in the term “pioneer” was designed to generate confusion with the Complainant’s trademark. As for the use of the disputed domain name in bad faith, the Complainant contends that using the disputed domain name in relation to a parking page featuring several commercial links shows that the Respondent intended to cause confusion in order to deceive Internet users and did so to gain commercially from the advertisements displayed on the web page.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions and is therefore in default.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Nathalie Dreyfus"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-01-15 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant, AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT, is the owner of the French trademark AMUNDI PIONEER No. 4 375549, registered July 11, 2017, covering services in class 36.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also owns the following domain names:\r\n\r\n-\t<amundi-pioneer.com> registered March 10, 2017;\r\n-\t<amundipioneer.com> registered February 20, 2017.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "AMUNDIPOINEER.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}