{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102361",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-02-19 09:43:24",
    "domain_names": [
        "bankintesasanpaolo.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "HOPE OKO OBOH"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nIt results from the Complainant’s undisputed allegations that it is the leading Italian banking group. Intesa Sanpaolo is the company resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two of the top Italian banking groups. Intesa Sanpaolo is among the top banking groups in the Euro zone and the undisputed leader in Italy, in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). Thanks to a network of approximately 4,200 branches throughout Italy, the Group offers its services to approximately 11,9 million customers. Intesa Sanpaolo has a strong presence in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of approximately 1.100 branches and over 7,5 million customers. Moreover, the international network specialised in supporting corporate customers is present in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and in the United States, Russia, China and India. \r\nIt also uses the official website <intesasanpaolo.com>. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant further contends its trademark INTESA SANPAOLO be distinctive and well-known all around the world.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <BANKINTESASANPAOLO.COM> was registered on December 19, 2018 and resolved to a parking page sponsoring among others banking and financial services, for whom the Complainant’s trademarks are registered and used.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided between the same parties and relating to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "\r\nNO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.\r\n\r\nIt is true that the Respondent sent a communication received on the on-line platform on March 6, 2019 stating that “Hello I have not replied because I am not in the country. I do not know about all of this my email was hacked and my personal information were stolen as a result the person that stole my identity used my personal information for this. I have already contacted godaddy to delete disputes domain, the email has been deleted and no longer in use and the domain will not be in existence once he current subscription has ended”. \r\nHowever, the Response Check provided by the ADR Center of the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) underlined deficiencies in the Response, because it did not annex any documentary or other evidence upon which the Respondent relies, together with a schedule indexing such documents. The Response appeared not to describe the grounds on which it is made. Therefore, the Response was not admitted to proceed further in the Administrative Proceeding. \r\nOn March 25, 2019 the ADR Center of the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) notified the Respondent's Default, i.e. the notification of administrative non-compliance(s) regarding the Response.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. Federica Togo"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-03-26 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of International trademark no. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, registered on March 07, 2007 for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42 and of European Union trademark no. 5301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, registered on June 18, 2007 for services in classes 35, 36 and 38.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BANKINTESASANPAOLO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}