{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102364",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-02-20 11:20:55",
    "domain_names": [
        "pioneerinvestmentgroup.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "AMUNDI PIONEER ASSET MANAGEMENT USA, INC."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Frederic  Brown "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nPlease see for instance WIPO Case No. Case No. D2018-1239, ACCOR v. Massa, Auchan <accorhotelgroup.com> (“The Panel finds that the Domain Name <accorhotelgroup.com> is confusingly similar with the ACCORHOTELS trademark of Complainant. The Domain Name incorporates the said trademark of Complainant in its entirety. This is sufficient to establish confusing similarity […] The omission of the letter “s” in the “hotels” portion of the Domain Name is disregarded as it merely signifies the singular grammatical number […] The word “group” which is added in the Domain Name is also disregarded as it is a non-distinctive dictionary term”)\r\n\r\nPlease see for instance FORUM Case No. FA 1781783, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II v. Chad Moston \/ Elite Media Group <bobsfromsketchers.com> (“Here, the WHOIS information of record identifies Respondent as “Chad Moston \/ Elite Media Group.” The Panel therefore finds under Policy paragraph 4(c)(ii) that Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name under Policy paragraph 4(c)(ii).”)\r\n\r\nPlease see CAC Case No. 102089, Amundi Pioneer Asset Management USA, Inc. v. anthony Zannini, <pioneerinvestments.app> (“It is clear that the Complainant's trademarks and website(s) were used by the Complainant long time before the disputed domain name was registered and used. It is therefore concluded that the disputed domain name was registered with an intention to attract customers of another well-known domain name\/registered trademark holder.”)",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The panel is not aware of any other decided or pending legal proceedings.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has not, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Rejected",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Etienne Wéry"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-04-08 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademarks for “PIONEER INVESTMENTS” over the world, including : \r\n- the European trademark PIONEER INVESTMENTS® n° 001125798 registered since 2000-06-02 and duly renewed;\r\n- the European trademark PIONEER Investments® n° 001879709 registered since 2002-02-26 and duly renewed;\r\n- the US trademark PIONEER INVESTMENTS® n° 76257330 registered since 2004-03-23 and duly renewed.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "PIONEERINVESTMENTGROUP.COM": "REJECTED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}