{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102437",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-04-11 10:10:26",
    "domain_names": [
        "jcdecauxglobal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "JCDECAUX SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Da Boo "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant was established in 1964. It is the worldwide number one in outdoor advertising and is the only group present in the three principal segments of outdoor advertising market: street furniture, transport advertising and billboard. The Complainant employs a total of 13,030 people and is present in approximatively 80 countries and 4,031 cities. It has more than 1,058,830 advertising panels in airports, rail and metro stations, shopping malls, on billboards and street furniture. The Complainant is listed on the Premier Marché of the Euronext Paris stock exchange and is part of Euronext 100 index, and has generated revenues of EUR 3,619 million in 2018.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant’s official website is located at the domain name <jcdecaux.com>, registered since 23 June 1997.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <jcdecauxglobal.com> was registered on 5 April 2019, and redirects to a Registrar parking page with commercial links. ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s JCDECAUX trademark, as it incorporates the trademark in its entirety. The addition of the term “global” is not sufficient to escape the finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the JCDECAUX trademark. It does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to this trademark and does not prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark. On the contrary, it reinforces the likelihood of confusion, as the Complainant’s social media accounts are named “jcdecauxglobal”. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and he is not related in any way to its business. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent, and has not granted any licence or authorization to the Respondent to make any use of the JCDECAUX trademark or to apply for registration of the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name points to a parking page with commercial links related to the Complainant, which is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or legitimate non-commercial or fair use. The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has registered the domain name only in order to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to its website by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademark.\r\n\r\nAccording to the Complainant, the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the JCDECAUX trademark is distinctive and well-known, and the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of it. The disputed domain name points to a parking page with commercial pay per click links related to the Complainant. The use of pay-per-click links on the Respondent’s website located at the disputed domain name which is confusingly similar to the JCDECAUX trademark shows that the Respondent must have intended to use the disputed domain name to attract Internet users to its website for commercial gain and such intentional use constitutes bad faith. In such circumstance it is irrelevant whether the commercial gain from misled Internet users is gained by the Respondent or by a third party, because the Respondent controls and cannot disclaim responsibility for the content appearing on the website to which the disputed domain name resolves. \r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Assen Alexiev"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-05-21 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the holder of the International trademark JCDECAUX with registration No.803987, registered on 27 November 2001 for goods and services in International Classes 6, 9, 11, 19, 20, 35, 37, 38, 39, 41 and 42 (the \"JCDEAUX trademark\").",
    "decision_domains": {
        "JCDECAUXGLOBAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}