{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102515",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-06-04 11:47:29",
    "domain_names": [
        "ercelormittal.website"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL (SA)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Comios Enterprises PLC"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, ARCELORMITTAL (SA), is the successor to Mittal Steel, a business originally set up in 1976 by Mr Lakshmi N Mittal. ArcelorMittal was created through the merger of Arcelor and Mittal Steel in 2006. The Complainant is a company specialized in steel production and is the largest steel production company in the world for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging with operations in more than 60 countries. It holds sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and operates extensive distribution networks.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on May 27, 2019, and presently resolves to a parking page.  \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name. ",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is identical to the ARCELORMITTAL mark since the substitution of the letter „A“ with „E“ in the disputed domain name and the addition the gTLD „.WEBSITE“  does not avoid confusing similarity with the Complainant’s trademark. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant also argues that Respondent does not have rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. Respondent is not commonly known as the domain name or in possession of licensing rights.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant further argues that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant argues that the Respondent is typosquatting with the disputed domain name and possessed actual notice and knowledge of its ARCELORMITTAL mark due to its fame and Respondent had acted in bad faith by registering the disputed domain name. \r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\nThe Respondent did not file a Response.  \r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Jonathan Agmon"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-07-22 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant is the owner of numerous “ArcelorMittal” trademarks worldwide and in the U.S. including „ArcelorMittal“ (Reg No. 947686 registered on June 18, 2007).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also owns various domain names including <arcelormittal.com> and <arcelormittal.website>.  \r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ERCELORMITTAL.WEBSITE": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}