{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102570",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-07-09 09:56:21",
    "domain_names": [
        "biursorama.com",
        "boursorana.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "zhang wei"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is BOURSORAMA S.A. It results from the Complainant’s undisputed allegations that it was founded in 1995 and has been growing in Europe with the emergence of e-commerce and the continuous expansion of the range of financial products online. In addition, its three core businesses are: online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking. In France, BOURSORAMA is the online banking reference with more than 1,700,000 customers. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is also the owner of the domain name <www.boursorama.com> (registered on March 1, 1998), that is in France the first national financial and economic information site and online banking platform, with more than 30 million monthly visits in late 2017. \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names <biursorama.com> and <boursorana.com> were registered on July 2, 2019 and resolved to a parking page displaying sponsored links. ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or decided between the same parties and relating to the disputed domain names. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr. Federica Togo"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-08-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademark registrations consisting of the term “BOURSORAMA”, in particular European Union trademark BOURSORAMA no. 1758614 registered on October 19, 2001.  ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BIURSORAMA.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "BOURSORANA.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}