{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102602",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-07-29 09:29:58",
    "domain_names": [
        "novartis.solutions"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Novartis AG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "BrandIT GmbH",
    "respondent": [
        "rajesh  rajesh"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is the proprietor of the NOVARTIS trademarks registered as a word and figurative mark in several classes across numerous countries all over the world. The Complainant is a global healthcare company based in Switzerland that provides solutions to address the evolving needs of patients worldwide. The Complainant’s products are sold in about 155 countries and they reached nearly 1 billion people globally in 2017. About 126 000 people of 145 nationalities work at Novartis around the world.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name has been registered on April 13, 2019. The Respondent has used a proxy server to register the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe website under the disputed domain name currently refers to IT- Services and trainings. Complainant found out that a, in view of design and content partially highly similar website referring to the same services is hosted under <omtrainings.com> whereas the e-mail of the Respondent is rajesh@omtrainings.com.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other proceedings related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dietrich Beier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-09-11 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Amongst many other trademarks, the Complainant is the proprietor of the Indian Trademark registration NOVARTIS 702108 applied for on March 18, 1996 for several goods in class 9.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "NOVARTIS.SOLUTIONS": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}