{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102729",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-10-22 10:09:50",
    "domain_names": [
        "intesasanpaoko.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "Lee Black"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a leading Italian banking group and also one of the protagonists in the European financial arena. \r\n\r\nIntesa Sanpaolo is among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 38,1 billion euro. Due to a network of approximately 3,900 branches capillary and well distributed throughout the Country, with market shares of more than 16 % in most Italian regions, the Group offers its services to approximately 11,8 million customers. Intesa Sanpaolo has a strong presence in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of approximately 1.100 branches and over 7,2 million customers. Moreover, the international network specialised in supporting corporate customers is present in 25 countries.\r\n\r\nOn May 19, 2019, the Respondent registered the domain name <INTESASANPAOKO.COM>.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any related proceedings. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.\r\n\r\nIn accordance with paragraph 11 of the UDRP, the Panel can determine the language of the proceeding otherwise having regard to the circumstances of the case. Since the website the disputed domain name is referring to which was filed as Annex C is partly in English and the website the domain name was referring to at the time of this decision was partly in English, partly in German showing a faked website of the US company Apple and wrongly indicating that the downloading computer was blocked, the Panel, having considered the circumstances of this case, determines that English is the language of the proceeding as requested by the Complainant.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dietrich Beier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-11-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the proprietor of the International trademark registration n. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, granted on March 7, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41 and 42, also covering Japan.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "INTESASANPAOKO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}