{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102785",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-11-19 09:06:13",
    "domain_names": [
        "bollore-logistics-uk.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOLLORE "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Kali Jim"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant was founded in 1822. Thanks to a diversification strategy based on innovation and international development, it holds strong positions in all its activities around three business lines, Transportation and Logistics, Communication and Media, and Electricity Storage Solutions.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is one of the 500 largest companies in the world. The BOLLORE Group has 81,003 employees world-wide with a turnover equaling 23,024 million euro based on 2017 results.\r\n\r\nIts subsidiary BOLLORE LOGISTICS is one of the 10 leading worldwide transport and logistics companies, with a presence on all five continents (609 offices in 107 countries and more than 20,600 employees).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also owns various domain names, such as <bollore-logistics.com> which has been registered since January 20, 2009, and communicates on the internet through these domain names.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <bollore-logistics-uk.com> was registered on November 14, 2019. The disputed domain name points to an inactive page.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that:\r\n\r\n1. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademarks\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the disputed domain name <bollore-logistics-uk.com> is confusingly similar to the trademark BOLLORE LOGISTICS.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant further affirms that, the addition of the geographical term “UK” (which refers to the United Kingdom) and two dashes in the trademark is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark BOLLORE LOGISTICS. The extension GTLD “.com” does not serve to distinguish the disputed domain name from the BOLLORE LOGISTICS mark, which is the distinctive component of the domain name.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, but as “Kali Jim”, and that the Respondent is not affiliated with or authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and is not related to the Complainant’s business in any way. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business dealings with, the Respondent. Finally, the disputed domain name has pointed to an inactive website since its registration. \r\n\r\n3. The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that owing to the renown of the Complainant’s trademarks, it can be presumed that the Respondent had actual knowledge of the Complainant’s distinctive trademarks. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant further contends that it is not possible to conceive of any plausible, actual or contemplated active use of the domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, such as passing off, being an infringement of consumer protection legislation, or being an infringement of the Complainant’s rights under trademark law. In addition, the passive holding of the disputed domain name should be considered a use in bad faith.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nNO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dr.  Fabrizio Bedarida"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-12-18 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant has proven to be the owner of the BOLLORE' LOGISTICS marks.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is, inter alia, the owner of the following trademarks: \r\n\r\nInternational trademark registration no. 1025892 “BOLLORE LOGISTICS” (device), granted on July 31, 2009;\r\n\r\nInternational trademark registration no. 1302823 “BOLLORE LOGISTICS” (device), granted on January 27, 2016.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOLLORE-LOGISTICS-UK.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}