{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102774",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-11-08 10:08:14",
    "domain_names": [
        "mittalmexico.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL (SA)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Mittal Mexico"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant (“ArcelorMittal”) is a steel producing company with headquarters in Luxembourg. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant asserts to be the largest steel producing company in the world and the global market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging with operations in more than 60 countries. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant submitted evidence that it is the registered owner of the trademark mentioned above under \"Identification of rights\". \r\n\r\nThe Complainant further asserts that it is the owner of various domain names consisting of the word \"MITTAL”. The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the domain name <arcelormittal.com>, registered on 26 January 2006.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on 4 November 2019. The Complainant provided evidence that, at the time of filing the Complaint, the disputed domain name was not in use. \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which relate to the disputed domain name. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2019-12-18 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the registered owner of the following trademark: \r\n\r\n-\tInternational trademark registration n. 1198046 “MITTAL” (word trademark), which also covers Mexico, registered on 5 December 2013, valid for classes 6 and 40.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "MITTALMEXICO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}