{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102806",
    "time_of_filling": "2019-12-10 10:46:52",
    "domain_names": [
        "studoicanal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "GROUPE CANAL +"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Natasha Irani"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a leading French audiovisual media group and active in the production of pay-TV and theme channels and the bundling and distribution of pay-TV services. The Complainant has 16.2 million subscribers worldwide and annual revenues of 5,16 billion Euros. \r\n\r\nStudio Canal is a subsidiary of the Complainant, and a leading studio in Europe for the production and distribution of movies and TV series. It operates directly (distribution to movie theatres, video, digital and TV channels) in the three main European markets of France, the United Kingdom and Germany, as well as in Australia and New Zealand. Studio Canal is also present in the United States and China. \r\n\r\nThe Respondent registered the disputed domain name <studoicanal.com> on 10 July 2019. The disputed domain name currently resolves to an error page and there is no evidence before the Panel that the disputed domain name has ever been used for an active website since it was registered.  ",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings relating to the disputed domain name.  ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Gregor Kleinknecht"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-01-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant owns several trade marks for the name STUDIO CANAL, including French trade mark STUDIO CANAL, registration 3015704, registered on 20 March 2000 in international classes 9, 16, 25, 35, 38, 41, and 42; European trade mark STUDIO CANAL, registration 001866151, registered on 20 September 2000 in international classes 9, 16, 35, 38, 41, and 42; and International trade mark STUDIOCANAL, registration 1109020, registered on 23 December 2011 in international classes 9, 16, 25, 35, 38, 41, and 42. Furthermore, the Complainant owns multiple domain names consisting of the word STUDIOCANAL, including <studiocanal.com>, registered on 21 March 2000, which is connected to the official STUDIO CANAL website.  ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "STUDOICANAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}