{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102840",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-01-06 10:57:52",
    "domain_names": [
        "boehringerinvestgr.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "ctdoty"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is a global leading pharmaceutical company, founded by Albert Boehringer (1861-1939) in Ingelheim am Rhein (Germany). The core businesses of the Complainant are human pharmaceuticals, animal health and biopharmaceuticals. The Complainant has 50,000 employees worldwide and its net sales in 2018 amounted to about Euros 17.5 billion.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered with privacy registration service on 22 December 2019. Upon receipt of the Complaint, the registrar disclosed the underlying registration data, identifying as registrant Charles Doty - ctdoty in the United States.\r\n\r\nAt the moment of the submission of the Complaint the disputed domain name resolved to a parking page of the registrar. At the moment of the drafting of this Decision, the disputed domain name resolves to a website displaying the script “account suspended”.\r\n\r\nThe facts asserted by the Complainant are not contested by the Respondent.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the disputed domain name.\r\n",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark, or apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant.\r\n\r\nBesides, the website related to the disputed domain name points to the registrar’s parking page. The Complainant contends that Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain name since its registration and this confirms that Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also contends that the registration of disputed domain name confusingly similar to the well-known trademark of the Complainant and, thus, the constructive knowledge on behalf of the Respondent of the Complainant’s potential rights, as well as the non-use of the disputed domain name, resolving to parking page, clearly shows the Respondent’s bad faith in the registration and use of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant, therefore, requests the transfer of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nNo administratively compliant Response has been filed.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Avv. Ivett Paulovics"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-02-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is owner of the International trademark BOEHRINGER no. 799761, registered on 2 December 2002, in classes 1, 3, 5, 10, 16, 30, 31, 35, 41, 42, 44, duly renewed.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is also owner of the domain name <boehringer.com> registered on 12 January 2000.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOEHRINGERINVESTGR.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}