{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102866",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-01-20 10:07:30",
    "domain_names": [
        "borsouramaacces.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Daniel Bernard"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that:\r\n\r\n1. The disputed domain name <borsouramaacces.com> is confusingly similar to its trademark BOURSORAMA®. Indeed, the domain name includes in its entirety the Complainant’s trademark.\r\nIt is well-established that “a domain name that wholly incorporates a Complainant’s registered trademark may be sufficient to establish confusing similarity for purposes of the UDRP”. Please see WIPO Case No. D2003-0888, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. Vasiliy Terkin.\r\nFinally, many UDRP decisions have also confirmed the Complainant’s rights such as:\r\n- WIPO Case No. D2019-0653, Boursorama S.A. v. Privacy Protection \/ Natalya Rustmovna <boursorama-connexion.site> ;\r\n- WIPO Case No. D2019-0422, Boursorama S.A. v. sabine jeane <b-sorama-group.com>;\r\n- CAC Case No. 102340, BOURSORAMA SA v. Céline Levy <boursorama-clients.com>.\r\n\r\n2. The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name.\r\nThe Respondent is not known by the Complainant. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent.\r\n\r\n3.The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith\r\nGiven the reputee of Complainant's trademark, the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark. Such conclusion has been reached in other UDRP proceedings, namely:\r\n- CAC Case No. 101131, BOURSORAMA v. PD Host Inc - Ken Thomas (“In the case at hand, the Respondent acted in bad faith especially because the Respondent, who has no connection with the well-known \"BOURSORAMA\" trademark, registered a domain name, which incorporates the well-known \"BOURSORAMA\" trademark and it is totally irrealistic to believe that the Respondent did not know the Complainant's trademark when registered the domain name <wwwboursorama.com>.”);\r\n- WIPO Case No. D2017-1463, Boursorama SA v. Estrade Nicolas (“Given the circumstances of the case including the evidence on record of the longstanding of use of the Complainant's trademark, and the distinctive nature of the mark BOURSORAMA, it is inconceivable to the Panel in the current circumstances that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name without prior knowledge of the Complainant and the Complainant's mark.”)\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of other legal proceedings relating to the disputed domain name.\r\n",
    "no_response_filed": "\r\nNO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Roberto Manno"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-03-02 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks BOURSORAMA, such as the European trademark n° 1758614 registered since 2001-10-19. The BOURSORAMA.COM domain name, created on 1998, is also assigned to the Complainant. ",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BORSOURAMAACCES.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}