{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102936",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-02-25 10:59:52",
    "domain_names": [
        "groupeboursorama.vip"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "masengo sa"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant, BOURSORAMA S.A., was founded in 1995 and is one of Europe’s pioneers for businesses in online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking. In France, BOURSORAMA is the online banking reference with over 2 million customers. The website <www.boursorama.com> is the first national financial and economic information site and first French online banking platform. \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name, <groupeboursorama.vip>, was registered on February 17, 2020 which presently resolves to an inactive webpage. It is the Complainant’s evidence that the disputed domain name used to resolve to a website which copied the Complainant’s official website <boursorama-banque.com>, in particular the Complainant’s customer access.\r\n\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the BOURSORAMA mark on the basis that the disputed domain name wholly incorporates the Complainant’s trademark and there is additional generic French term “GROUPE” to its trademark and a generic top-level domain name suffix (“gTLD”) “.vip” which are insufficient to avoid the finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its BOURSORAMA mark.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also argues that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent was not identified in the WhoIs database prior to verification by the registrar. In addition, the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant nor did the Complainant license or authorize the Respondent to use the BOURSORAMA mark.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant further asserts that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith as the Respondent should have known of the Complainant’s BOURSORAMA mark at the time of registration of the disputed domain name. The Complainant also asserts that the domain name is being used in bad faith as the disputed domain name resolved to a website which copied the Complainant’s official website and the Respondent was using the disputed domain name to pass off as the Complainant to retrieve personal information from the Complainant’s customers, i.e. their user ID and password, and that such impersonation of a complainant in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme may be evidence of bad faith.\r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. Jonathan Agmon"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-03-28 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of the trademark BOURSORAMA (EUTM Registration No. 1758614) registered on October 19, 2001. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant is also the holder of several domain names, including the domain names <boursorama.com>, registered on March 1, 1998, and <boursorama-banque.com>, registered on May 26, 2005.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "GROUPEBOURSORAMA.VIP": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}