{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102972",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-03-19 10:04:53",
    "domain_names": [
        "jardiancedosing.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "neeraj manchanda"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "As the Respondent did not file any response to the complaint, the Panel took into account the following facts asserted by the Complainant (and supported by the documentary evidence submitted by the Complainant) and unchallenged by the Respondent:\r\n\r\n(a) the Complainant is the owner of the Complainant’s Trademark;\r\n\r\n(b) the disputed domain name was registered on 10 February 2020;\r\n\r\n(c) There is no website under the disputed domain name just the \"coming soon\" page; and\r\n\r\n(d) the Respondent has registered another domain name which includes name of pharmaceutical product of the Complainant <pradaxadosing.com> with the same \"coming soon\" page.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant seeks transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "PARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nIn addition to the above factual assertions, the Complainant also contends the following:\r\n\r\n(i) disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Trademark;\r\n\r\n(ii) the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, is not affiliated with the Complainant nor authorized by it in any way to use Complainant’s Trademark. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Furthermore, the disputed domain name redirects to a page in construction. The Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain name since its registration and has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name. As a result, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name;\r\n\r\n(iii) the term \"dosing\" included in the disputed domain name demonstrates that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name in knowledge of Complainant's Trademark which is registered and used for pharmaceutical preparations. Also the Respondent did not respond to cease and desist letter sent by the Complainant. The Respondent has registered also another domain name <pradaxadosing.com> confusingly similar to the trademark of the Complainant PRADAXA. These circumstances clearly amount to bad faith of the Respondent in registration and use of the disputed domain name. \r\n\r\nTHE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not provide any response to the complaint.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).\r\n\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).\r\n\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).\r\n\r\n\r\nFor details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Michal Matějka"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-04-18 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the registered owner of international word trademark “JARDIANCE”, reg. no. 981336, with seniority date 30 April 2008, for goods and services in class 5, pharmaceutical preparations (\"Complainant's Trademark\"). \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <jardiancedosing.com> was registered on 10 February 2020.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "JARDIANCEDOSING.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}