{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102982",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-03-20 09:54:14",
    "domain_names": [
        "cosmetics-esthederm.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "NAOS"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "ZAHORI GROUP s.r.o."
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "Founded in France 40 years ago by Jean-Noël Thorel, a pharmacist-biologist, NAOS is a major player in skincare thanks to its three brands: Bioderma, Institut Esthederm and Etat Pur.\r\n\r\nRanked among the top 10 independent beauty companies, NAOS is a pioneer in biology and shifts the Skincare industry paradigm. NAOS owes its success to the dedication of more than 2,900 employees located around the world through its international presence based on 46 subsidiaries and long-term partnerships with local distributors .\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name redirects to a parking page with commercial links in reference with the Complainant. See American Council on Education and GED Testing Service LLC v. Anthony Williams, FA1760954 (Forum Jan. 8, 2018) (“Respondent’s hosting of links to Complainant’s competitors demonstrates bad faith registration and use of the <geddiploma.org> domain name pursuant to Policy paragraph 4(b)(iv)”). Use of a disputed domain name to resolve to a webpage that offers links related to a complainant’s mark may be evidence of bad faith per Policy paragraph 4(b)(iv). See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, FA1878031 (Forum Jan. 31, 2020) (finding bad faith use where disputed domain resolved to a parked website providing click-through links).",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any pending or decided proceeding related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "The Respondent has decided not to join the proceeding.",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Massimo Cimoli"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-04-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": " NAOS is the trademark proprietor of several trademarks ISTITUTE ESTHEDERM around the world, such as to cite only few of them the following:\r\nInternational Registration for ISTITUTE ESTHEDERM 561679 as of 1990;\r\nEUTM for ISTITUTSE ESTHEDERM PARIS 815392 as of 2003.\r\n\r\nThese trademark registrations predate the registration of the disputed domain name, on March 4th, 2018   as shown in the WHOIS \r\nThe Complainant is also proprietor of several domain names including the trademark ESTHEDERM and the most important is esthederm.com.\r\nThe Respondent’s domain name redirects to a parking page with commercial links in reference with the Complainant and to other subject matter related to cosmetics.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "COSMETICS-ESTHEDERM.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}