{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-102971",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-03-19 10:03:42",
    "domain_names": [
        "pradaxadosing.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "neeraj manchanda"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe term PRADAXA have been confirmed by a previous Panel in the CAC Case No. 102405, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v. smartpatient gmbh <PRADAXA.app> (“The Complainant has provided evidence of its trademark registration of the PRADAXA mark.”).\r\n\r\nThe Complainant sent a cease and desist letter to the Respondent in order to know the purpose of this registration. The Respondent did not reply. See LEGO Juris A\/S v Thai Dang, WIPO Case No. D2018-1929 (\"Respondent’s failure to reply to three cease and desist letters sent by the Complainant is further evidence of bad faith, given all of the other circumstances of this case\").",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any pending or decided case related to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Carrie Shang"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-05-02 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant has provided evidence of its trademark registration of the PRADAXA mark.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "PRADAXADOSING.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}