{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103039",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-05-12 09:39:10",
    "domain_names": [
        "INTESASANSPAOLO.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "extras (Kat Newman)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant (“Intesa Sanpaolo”) is a well-known Italian banking group, which is also active in the rest of Europe. Intesa Sanpaolo is the company resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., which are two Italian banking groups. The Complainant claims to be among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalization exceeding 26,1 billion euros. Besides banking, the Complainant is also active in other business areas such as retail, and corporate & wealth management. The Complainant claims to have a network of approximately 3,800 branches, with market shares of more than 15% in most Italian regions. The Complainant claims to offer its services to approximately 11,8 million customers. The Complainant also claims to have ‘a strong presence’ in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of approximately 1.000 branches and over 7,2 million customers. Moreover, the Complainant claims to have an international network specialized in supporting corporate customers in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and areas where Italian companies are active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant submitted evidence that it is the registered owner of the trademarks mentioned above under \"Identification of rights\". \r\n\r\nThe Complainant further asserts that it is the owner of various domain names consisting of the terms \"INTESA\" and “INTESA SANPAOLO”, and different domain extensions (including intesasanpaolo.com, intesasanpaolo.org, ntesasanpaolo.eu, intesasanpaolo.info, intesasanpaolo.net, intesasanpaolo.biz, intesa-sanpaolo.com, intesa-sanpaolo.org, intesa-sanpaolo.eu, intesa-sanpaolo.info, intesa-sanpaolo.net, intesa-sanpaolo.biz, intesa.com, intesa.info, intesa.biz, intesa.org, intesa.us, intesa.eu, intesa.cn, intesa.in, intesa.co.uk, intesa.tel, intesa.name, intesa.xxx, and intesa.me). According to the Complainant, all of these domain names are connected to its official website www.intesasanpaolo.com. However, the Complainant did not submit evidence of these assertions.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on October 10, 2019. \r\n\r\nThe domain is currently not in use.\r\n\r\nOn November 4, 2019, the Complainant’s attorneys sent to the Respondent a cease and desist letter, asking for the voluntary transfer of the disputed domain name. The Respondent did not comply with this request.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which relate to the disputed domain name. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-06-12 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the registered owner of the following trademarks: \r\n\r\n- International trademark registration n. 793367 “INTESA”, registered on September 4, 2002 and duly renewed, valid for various classes including class 36 (“financial affairs”; etc.);\r\n- International trademark registration n. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO” (word trademark), registered on March 7, 2007 and duly renewed, valid for various classes including class 36 (“financial affairs”; etc.), also covering the United States of America;\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 012247979 “INTESA” (word trademark), applied on October 23, 2013 and registered on March 5, 2014, valid for various classes including class 36 (“financial affairs”; etc.);\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 005301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO” (word trademark), applied on September 8, 2006, registered on June 18, 2007 and duly renewed, valid for various classes including class 36 (“financial affairs”; etc.).\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "INTESASANSPAOLO.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}