{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103074",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-05-22 10:40:51",
    "domain_names": [
        "bollrore.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOLLORE SE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "Doris Coperate"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nCAC Case No. 102618, BOLLORE v. William Cameron. Where the Complainant’s registered trademark Bollore is fully included in the disputed domain name and combined with the addition of the letter \"z\", and the gTLD suffix “.com”, the Panel ruled that the addition of the letter \"z\" without space or hyphen at the end of the disputed domain name and the gTLD “.com” was not sufficient to escape the finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark and did not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the trademark Bollore, as the trademark Bollore at the more important beginning of the disputed domain name is the only distinctive part of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nPast Panels have confirmed the notoriety of the trademarks BOLLORE® in the following cases:\r\n- CAC Case No. 102015, BOLLORE SA v. mich john (“the Panel takes note, again, of the distinctiveness of the Complainant's brand and the intention that must be presumed to exist in registering a domain name bearing such confusing similarity with well-known brand name.”);\r\n- CAC Case No. 101696, BOLLORE v. Hubert Dadoun (“As the Complainant is also one of the largest 500 companies in the world, the Panel accepts the Complainant's contention that their trademark has a strong reputation and is in fact to be considered well-known.”)\".\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr. E.J.V.T. van den Broek"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-06-19 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "Complainant is owner of :\r\nInternational Trademark 704697 Bolloré, registered on 11.12.1998.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOLLRORE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}