{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103123",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-06-24 08:57:50",
    "domain_names": [
        "INTESA-SICUREZZA.COM"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "Kenny Rogers Roasters"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "The Complainant is an italian based company active in the banking field. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant owns numerous trademarks composed by \"INTESA\" or \"INTESA SAN PAOLO\" and operates the domain name <intesasanpaolo.com>.\r\n\r\nAccording to the information provided by the Registrar, the Respondent is Kenny Rogers based in the italian town of Cosseria. The disputed domain name currently resolves to an inactive page. \r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of pending or decided legal proceedings which relate to the disputed domain name. ",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nPARTIES' CONTENTIONS:\r\n\r\nCOMPLAINANT:\r\n\r\nAs regards the first element of the Policy, the Complainant supports that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the \"INTESA\" and \"INTESA SAN PAOLO\" trademarks. The addition of the element \"SICUREZZA\" does not impact on the confusingly similarity assessment in view of its dictionary meaning. \r\n\r\nAs regards the second element of the Policy, the Complainant denies that the Respondent has been authorized to use the trademarks \"INTESA\" and \"INTESA SAN PAOLO\" in the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nAs regards the third element of the Policy, the Complainant claims that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the disputed domain name registration to the Complainant. \r\n\r\n\r\nRESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Respondent did not submit any reply. ",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).  ",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).  ",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).  ",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Andrea Mascetti"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-07-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant proved to be the owner of the following “INTESA” and “INTESA SANPAOLO” trademarks: \r\n\r\n- International trademark registration n. 793367 “INTESA”, granted on September 4, 2002 and duly renewed, in class 36; \r\n\r\n- International trademark registration n. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, granted on March 7, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41, 42;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 12247979 “INTESA”, applied on October 23, 2013 and granted on March 5, 2014, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;\r\n\r\n- EU trademark registration n. 5301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, applied on September 8, 2006, granted on June 18, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 35, 36 and 38.\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "INTESA-SICUREZZA.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}