{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103112",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-06-15 10:05:41",
    "domain_names": [
        "amundicoin.com",
        "amundicoins.com",
        "a-mundicoin.com",
        "abbamundicoin.com",
        "a-zmundicoin.com",
        "aamundicoin.com",
        "amundicoin.net",
        "aaamundicoin.com",
        "amundicoin.org"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Enora Millocheau)",
    "respondent": [
        "elliott  arkin "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is Europe's number one asset manager by assets under management and has offices in 37 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and the Americas.  The Complainant ranks in the top 10 global asset managers and has EUR 1,425 billion in assets under management and over 100 million retail, institutional and corporate clients.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is the owner of international registered trademark no. 1024160 for the word mark AMUNDI, registered on September 24, 2009.  The Complainant is the registrant of the domain name <amundi.com>, registered on August 26, 2004, which is used for its official website.  The Complainant also owns several other domain names consisting of its AMUNDI trademark coupled with terms related to its activities.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names were registered in June 2020 and each resolves to a registrar parking page with commercial links.  \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names wholly incorporate and are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s said registered trademark and the addition of various letters and\/or generic words are insufficient to avoid the likelihood of confusion. The generic top-level domain in each disputed domain name can be disregarded for comparison purposes. The Complainant’s rights have been confirmed by previous panels under the Policy.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain names.  The Respondent is neither affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way.  The Respondent does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Complainant.  No license or authorization has been granted to the Respondent by the Complainant to use its said trademark or to apply for registration of the disputed domain names.  \r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names resolve to parking pages with commercial links.  Such use does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods and services.  \r\n\r\nThe Respondent must have had knowledge of and intent to target the Complainant at the point of registration.  This is demonstrated by the extent of the Complainant’s business and the notoriety of the Complainant’s trademark, which has been confirmed by previous panels under the Policy, and by the nature of the disputed domain names themselves, which consist of the Complainant’s mark with terms relevant to the Complainant’s field of activity.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain names redirect to parking pages with commercial links, such that the Respondent has attempted to attract Internet users for commercial gain to its own website by use of the Complainant’s trademark, which is evidence of bad faith.  It does not matter for the purposes of the Policy whether such commercial gain is made by the Respondent or its registrar.",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.",
    "rights": "For the reasons outlined in the Principal Reasons for the Decision below, the Panel does not require to make a formal finding regarding paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "For the reasons outlined in the Principal Reasons for the Decision below, the Panel does not require to make a formal finding regarding paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.",
    "bad_faith": "For the reasons outlined in the Principal Reasons for the Decision below, the Panel does not require to make a formal finding regarding paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Settled",
    "panelists": [
        "Andrew Lothian"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-07-29 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of the following International registered trademark:\r\n\r\n- AMUNDI, word mark, registered on September 24, 2009 under number 1024160 in use class 36 and designated in respect of 18 territories.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "AMUNDICOIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "AMUNDICOINS.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "A-MUNDICOIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "ABBAMUNDICOIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "A-ZMUNDICOIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "AAMUNDICOIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "AMUNDICOIN.NET": "TRANSFERRED",
        "AAAMUNDICOIN.COM": "TRANSFERRED",
        "AMUNDICOIN.ORG": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}