{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103135",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-06-24 10:41:30",
    "domain_names": [
        "Arcel0rmlttal.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        "parowki llc"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is ARCELORMITTAL S.A., a multinational steel manufacturing corporation, it is the largest steel producing company in the world and the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging, with operations in more than 60 countries. It holds sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and operates extensive distribution networks.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant operates under the trademark ARCELORMITTAL, registered in several countries worldwide, and owns several “arcelormittal“ domain names, among which <arcelormittal.com>, which was registered since 27 January 2006.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name <Arcel0rmlttal.com> was registered was registered on 08 May 2020 and redirects to a parking page. \r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of other pending or decided legal proceedings, which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant's contentions are the following:\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's earlier ARCELORMITTAL trademark since it contains an obvious misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark. The substitution of the letter “O” by the number zero “0” in the Complainant’s trademark and the omission of the letter “I” is insufficient to avoid confusing similarity. \r\n\r\nTherefore, the disputed domain name is a clear case of typosquatting. Previous UDRP panels have found that slight spelling variations do not prevent a disputed domain name from being confusing similar to the Complainant’s  trademark.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, the Complainant contends that the addition of the gTLD “.COM” does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant sustains that this does not prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant, its trademark and its domain names associated.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant further contends that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name for a number of reasons.\r\n\r\nFirst, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent does not appear to be commonly known by the disputed domain name. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant further asserts that the Respondent has no relationships with the Complainant. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with, the Respondent. \r\n\r\nThe Respondent is not a Complainant’s licensee, nor has ever been authorised to make use of the Complainant’s trademark or to apply for the registration of the disputed domain name. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant’s further asserts that disputed domain name is a typosquatted version of the ARCELORMITTAL trademark.\r\n\r\nTyposquatting is an attempt to take advantage of Internet users’ typographical errors and can be evidence of the Respondent’s lack of rights or legitimate interests in a domain name. \r\n\r\nLastly, the Complainant points out that the disputed domain name redirects to a parking page and that the Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain name since its registration and it confirms that Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name, which is further evidence of the Respondent’s lack of rights or legitimate interests.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant argues that the disputed domain name has been registered, and is been used in bad faith. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant’s maintains that its ARCELORMITTAL trademark is well-known and therefore, that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant’s trademark. \r\n\r\nFurthermore, the disputed domain name is a form of typosquatting. Typosquatting is also evidence of bad faith.\r\n\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Delia-Mihaela Belciu"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-08-06 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant bases its Complaint on the trademark ARCELORMITTAL, International trademark registration No. 947686, registered since 3 August 2007, protected for goods and services in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42, designating several countries for protection. \r\n\r\n",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ARCEL0RMLTTAL.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}