{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103130",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-06-26 09:19:20",
    "domain_names": [
        "02intesasanpaolo.top"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Šárka Glasslová (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "IntesaSanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Perani Pozzi Associati",
    "respondent": [
        "Tye Dye Eye - Leland Hillman"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is among the top banking groups in the euro zone, with a market capitalisation exceeding 27,2 billion euro, and the undisputed leader in Italy in all business areas (retail, corporate and wealth management). Its international network  is present in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and in the United States, Russia, China and India. The Complainant’s “INTESA SANPAOLO” trademark is distinctive and well known all around the world.\r\n\r\nThe Respondent registered the domain name 02INTESASANPAOLO.TOP on February 15, 2020. It does not resolve to an active website.\r\n\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "There are no other legal proceedings of which the Panel is aware that are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Alan Limbury"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-08-10 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of the following registrations, among others, for the trademark “INTESA SANPAOLO”:\r\n\r\n-\tInternational trademark registration n. 920896 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, granted on March 07, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41, 42;\r\n\r\n-\tEU trademark registration n. 5301999 “INTESA SANPAOLO”, granted on June 18, 2007 and duly renewed, in classes 35, 36 and 38.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "02INTESASANPAOLO.TOP": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}