{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-103246",
    "time_of_filling": "2020-08-20 11:28:00",
    "domain_names": [
        "boursorafinance.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA SA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nameshield (Laurent Becker)",
    "respondent": [
        " Ozin Franck"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:\r\n\r\nThe Complainant is a French financial institution, founded in 1995, and a pioneer and leader in online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking. In France, the Complainant has over 2 million customers and its portal at www.boursorama.com is the first national financial and economic information site and the first French online banking platform.\r\n\r\nThe disputed domain name was registered on 16 August 2020 and is inactive.\r\n",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any other pending or decided legal proceedings relating to the disputed domain name.",
    "no_response_filed": "NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.\r\n\r\nAccording to the Complainant, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademarks as it fully incorporates them and the addition of the term \"finance\" does not change the overall impression that the disputed domain name is connected to the Complainant.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant further maintains that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name as the Respondent is not connected with the Complainant and is not one of the Complainant's affiliates or licensees. Moreover, the Complainant never authorized the Respondent to make use of its trademarks or to apply for the registration of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nThe Complainant also claims that the Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed domain name as it is not listed in the relevant WhoIs information as the disputed domain name.Lastly, the Complainant points out that the disputed domain name is not used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or for a legitimate, noncommercial or fair use, as it resolves to an inactive website. \r\n\r\nIn relation to the registration and use of the disputed domain name in bad faith, the Complainant asserts that its trademarks are well-known and therefore it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.  The addition of the term \"finance\" to the Complainant's trademark is further evidence of the fact that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant's trademark at the time of the registration of the disputed domain name.\r\n\r\nFinally, the Complainant maintains that under certain circumstances the passive holding of a domain name cannot prevent a finding of bad faith and that the case at issue is one where the passive holding of the disputed domain name cannot avoid bad faith.\r\n\r\n",
    "rights": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).",
    "bad_faith": "The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).",
    "procedural_factors": "The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Angelica Lodigiani"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2020-09-25 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant is the owner of the following trademark registrations:\r\n\r\n- BOURSORAMA, EUTM registration No. 1758614, filed on 13 July 2000, and registered on 19 October 2001, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;\r\n\r\n- BOURSO, French registration No. 3009973, of 22 February 2000, for goods and services in classes 9, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42. \r\n\r\nThe Complainant also owns and operates the domain name <boursorama.com>, which was registered on 13 March 1998.",
    "decision_domains": {
        "BOURSORAFINANCE.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}